All termsFintechIntermediateUpdated April 23, 2026

What Is Open Finance?

Open Finance extends Open Banking beyond payment accounts to encompass insurance, investments, pensions, and mortgages — enabling consented, API-driven data sharing across the entire financial ecosystem via authorised third parties.

Also known as: open financial data, financial data sharing, open data finance, financial openness

Key Takeaways

  • Open Finance extends Open Banking to all financial products — insurance, pensions, investments, and mortgages — not just payment accounts.
  • Consented API-driven data sharing lets authorised third parties build richer, personalised financial products across the ecosystem.
  • Merchants benefit through more accurate credit decisioning, faster checkout, and reduced reliance on card networks.
  • Regulation is evolving fast — the EU's FIDA proposal and the UK's Financial Data and Services (FDS) framework are setting global benchmarks.
  • Strong consent architecture and standardised APIs are foundational — without them, open finance creates more risk than value.

How Open Finance Works

Open Finance is built on the same consent-and-API architecture that underpins Open Banking, but applied across the full spectrum of financial services. A consumer grants explicit permission for a specific third party to access specific categories of their financial data. The financial institution then exposes that data through a standardised API, and the third party uses it to deliver a product or service — all without requiring the consumer to share passwords or paper statements.

The process follows a consistent pattern regardless of the data type or institution involved.

01

Consumer initiates consent

The customer selects a product or service offered by a Third-Party Provider (TPP) and is presented with a clear consent request. This specifies exactly which financial institution, which data categories, and for how long access is granted. Consent is explicit, granular, and revocable at any time.

02

Identity and authorisation

The consumer authenticates directly with their financial institution — their bank, insurer, or pension provider — using strong customer authentication (SCA). This confirms the consent without the third party ever handling login credentials, reducing the risk of credential theft.

03

Data is exposed via API

The financial institution's open-banking-style API returns the requested data in a structured, machine-readable format. Depending on the regulatory framework, this may be a read-only data feed (for account information) or an action-capable endpoint (for payment initiation or variable recurring payments).

04

Third party builds value on top of data

The TPP — which could be a lender, insurance aggregator, payment orchestrator, or wealth manager — processes the financial data to deliver its service. This might be an instant credit decision, a personalised insurance quote, or a cross-institution cashflow dashboard.

05

Consumer benefits from enriched services

The end result is a product or service that is faster, more accurate, and more personalised than what was previously possible. The consumer retains full control: they can withdraw consent via the institution's portal or the TPP's interface at any time, and data access expires automatically at the agreed end date.

Why Open Finance Matters

Open Finance represents a structural shift in how financial data flows — from siloed institutions to interoperable, consumer-controlled networks. For merchants and payment professionals, this has direct commercial implications: lower transaction costs, better fraud signals, and access to financial products that would previously have required weeks of manual underwriting.

The scale of the opportunity is significant. The global open banking and open finance market was valued at approximately $22.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach $123.7 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 27.4% (Allied Market Research, 2023). This growth is driven by regulatory mandates, rising API standardisation, and consumer demand for more personalised financial products.

In the UK, the Financial Data and Services (FDS) framework — which builds on psd2-era open banking infrastructure — is expected to govern access to assets across pensions, savings, and investments sectors collectively worth over £20 trillion. Separately, a 2024 Plaid survey found that 71% of SMEs said access to richer financial data would meaningfully improve their ability to manage cash flow and secure financing. For B2B merchants, this directly translates into better trade credit terms and faster payment cycles.

Regulatory watch

The EU's Financial Data Access (FIDA) regulation, proposed in June 2023, would require insurers, asset managers, and pension funds to share data with authorised TPPs upon customer consent — creating the first comprehensive open finance mandate in a major market. Implementation timelines are expected from 2026 onwards.

Open Finance vs. Open Banking

Open Finance is frequently conflated with Open Banking. They share the same technical and consent architecture, but differ significantly in scope, maturity, and regulatory status. Understanding the distinction is critical when evaluating which data sources are available, which institutions are obligated to share, and which regulatory frameworks govern the product you are building.

DimensionOpen BankingOpen Finance
ScopePayment accounts (current, credit)All financial products (insurance, pensions, investments, mortgages)
Regulatory statusMandated in EU (PSD2), UK, Brazil, AustraliaEmerging — FIDA (EU), FDS (UK), voluntary elsewhere
Data typesTransaction history, balances, payment initiationInsurance policies, pension values, investment portfolios, mortgage data
Use casesA2A payments, account aggregation, credit scoringFull affordability checks, pension dashboards, cross-product personalisation
API maturityStandardised (Open Banking UK, Berlin Group)Fragmented — standards still developing
Consumer awarenessGrowing, especially in the UKEarly stage in most markets
Third-party accessPayment initiation, account informationRead access expanding to action capabilities over time

Types of Open Finance

Open Finance is not a single product category — it is an umbrella term for data-sharing across multiple distinct financial verticals. Each vertical has its own data structures, regulatory considerations, and use cases relevant to merchants and payment professionals.

Open Insurance covers life, home, motor, and health policies. Insurers expose coverage details, claims history, and premium data, enabling real-time comparison, embedded cover at checkout, and dynamic underwriting.

Open Pensions provides access to retirement account balances and contribution history. This is central to affordability decisioning for large purchases and mortgage applications, and is a focus of the UK's Pensions Dashboard Programme.

Open Investments and Wealth exposes brokerage and ISA holdings, enabling wealth aggregation apps and more accurate net-worth-based credit decisioning. Relevant to high-value merchants offering financing.

Open Mortgage and Lending makes existing credit obligations and repayment history available, complementing credit bureau data with real-time, consent-driven signals — particularly valuable for embedded-finance checkout lending.

Open Payments — the most mature vertical — encompasses account-to-account-payments, variable recurring payments (VRP), and sweep services. This is where open finance has the most immediate commercial impact for merchants today.

Best Practices

Open Finance unlocks significant value, but only when implemented with clear data governance, robust APIs, and well-designed consent flows. The risks of a poor implementation — regulatory breaches, consumer distrust, or data leakage — can outweigh the benefits.

For Merchants

Map your data needs before integrating. Identify specifically which financial data categories you need and why — income verification, affordability scoring, identity confirmation — and ensure your consent request is scoped accordingly. Requesting more data than necessary increases regulatory risk and damages consumer trust.

Prioritise providers with standardised API coverage. Where possible, work with TPPs and aggregators that access data via regulated, standardised APIs rather than screen-scraping fallbacks. Standardised access is more reliable, more secure, and more likely to remain compliant as regulation matures.

Design consent into the UX, not onto it. Consent prompts placed as friction points will be dismissed or misunderstood. Present the value exchange clearly: explain what data you are accessing, why, and what the customer gets in return. Conversion rates for consent-based flows improve significantly when the benefit is explicit.

Build for data expiry. Open finance consent is time-limited. Build your systems to handle token refresh, consent renewal, and graceful degradation when access lapses — rather than treating a one-time grant as permanent access.

For Developers

Implement OAuth 2.0 and FAPI profiles correctly. Open finance APIs follow the Financial-grade API (FAPI) security profile, which builds on OAuth 2.0 with additional requirements for token binding, PKCE, and mTLS. Use certified libraries and have your implementation audited before going to production.

Normalise data across institutions. Financial data formats vary by institution and jurisdiction. Build a normalisation layer that maps institution-specific field names and formats to a canonical internal schema, so your downstream logic is decoupled from provider-specific quirks.

Log consent events immutably. Every consent grant, scope change, and revocation must be logged with a timestamp and audit trail. This is required under most data protection frameworks and is essential for responding to consumer access requests or regulatory investigations.

Test against sandbox environments that mirror production edge cases. Many open finance sandboxes do not reflect the full range of account states — empty accounts, frozen accounts, accounts with complex product structures. Invest in test fixtures that cover these scenarios before going live.

Common Mistakes

1. Treating open finance as synonymous with open banking. Open banking covers payment accounts. Open finance extends to insurance, pensions, investments, and mortgages. Building a product on the assumption that all financial data is available via existing open banking APIs will result in gaps — particularly for pension and insurance data, which requires separate integrations and, in some markets, separate regulatory authorisation.

2. Ignoring consent lifecycle management. Consent in open finance is not a one-time event. It expires, can be revoked, and may need to be renewed if the scope changes. Systems that do not handle token expiry, revocation webhooks, and re-consent flows will silently lose access to data — often without surfacing an obvious error to the end user.

3. Over-scoping data requests. Requesting access to more financial data categories than your use case requires is a common compliance error. Under GDPR and equivalent frameworks, data minimisation is a legal obligation, not a best practice. Over-scoping also increases consumer hesitation at the consent screen, reducing conversion.

4. Building on non-standardised or screen-scraping APIs. Some aggregators still supplement standardised API coverage with screen-scraping for institutions that have not yet opened their APIs. This is increasingly prohibited under PSD2 and equivalent frameworks, fragile to institution website changes, and a liability in any regulated market. Verify your aggregator's data access methods before signing a contract.

5. Underestimating cross-border regulatory complexity. A product compliant in the UK under the FDS framework may require separate authorisation and consent flows in the EU under FIDA, and face a completely different voluntary framework in the US. Build your data-portability and consent architecture to be jurisdiction-aware from the start, rather than retrofitting it after expansion.

Open Finance and Tagada

Open Finance is directly relevant to how payment orchestration platforms like Tagada route and optimise transactions. By connecting to open finance data flows, Tagada can access real-time account balance signals, income verification data, and affordability scores to make smarter routing decisions — sending high-value transactions through account-to-account rails instead of card networks when the cost and conversion maths favours it.

How Tagada uses open finance signals

Tagada's orchestration layer can ingest open finance data — including account balances and verified income signals from consented sources — to dynamically select the optimal payment method at checkout. For merchants with high average order values, this means routing eligible customers to A2A payment flows with lower interchange costs, without any change to the customer-facing checkout experience.

For merchants using Tagada, open finance also strengthens the data inputs used in fraud scoring and payment method eligibility. A customer presenting a verified, consented view of their financial position — rather than a self-declared income figure — enables more accurate real-time decisioning, fewer false declines, and better approval rates on embedded financing products.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is open finance and how does it differ from open banking?

Open Banking focuses specifically on payment accounts — current accounts and credit cards — requiring banks to share data with authorised third parties via APIs. Open Finance goes further, extending the same consent-driven data sharing model to insurance policies, pension pots, mortgage accounts, investment portfolios, and savings products. While open banking is largely mandated by regulation (such as PSD2 in Europe), open finance is an emerging framework that builds on those foundations to cover the entire personal and business financial life of a consumer or company.

Is open finance regulated?

Open finance is at different stages of regulatory maturity depending on jurisdiction. In the UK, the Financial Data and Services (FDS) bill proposes a statutory framework covering pensions, savings, and investments. In the EU, the Financial Data Access (FIDA) regulation, proposed in 2023, would mandate data sharing across insurers, asset managers, and pension providers. In contrast, markets like the US rely on voluntary frameworks and commercial APIs. Merchants and developers building on open finance data should monitor their target markets closely, as compliance requirements will vary significantly.

How does open finance benefit ecommerce merchants?

For merchants, open finance unlocks several practical advantages. Access to a customer's full financial picture — income, spending patterns, existing credit, and assets — allows for more accurate real-time credit decisioning at checkout, reducing declined transactions and abandonment. It also enables account-to-account payment initiation without card network fees, variable recurring payments for subscription models, and instant affordability checks that improve conversion. Merchants operating in B2B contexts gain access to richer buyer financial data, enabling better invoice financing and dynamic payment terms.

What financial data does open finance cover?

Open finance covers a broad range of financial product categories beyond the bank account. These include savings and deposit accounts, insurance policies (life, home, motor, health), pension and retirement funds, investment portfolios and ISAs, mortgage and secured lending accounts, and consumer credit products such as loans and BNPL. Under emerging regulatory frameworks like FIDA, financial institutions holding this data would be required to expose it via standardised APIs upon valid consumer consent — creating a comprehensive, portable financial profile for each customer.

What are the main risks of open finance?

The primary risks include data security vulnerabilities if APIs are poorly implemented or third-party providers lack strong authentication. Consent fatigue is a real concern — when consumers are asked to grant access repeatedly across many providers, they may consent without fully understanding what they are sharing. Regulatory fragmentation across jurisdictions creates compliance overhead for global platforms. There is also a risk of data monopolisation, where large platforms aggregate vast financial datasets, raising competition and privacy concerns. Robust consent management, encryption at rest and in transit, and regular third-party audits are essential mitigations.

How is open finance connected to embedded finance?

Open finance and embedded finance are complementary but distinct. Open finance is the infrastructure layer — it defines how financial data is accessed and shared via APIs with consumer consent. Embedded finance is the distribution layer — it describes how financial products like lending, insurance, or payments are integrated directly into non-financial platforms such as ecommerce sites or SaaS tools. Open finance data enriches embedded finance experiences: a checkout lending product embedded in a merchant's store can use open finance data to make an accurate, instant affordability decision without requiring a lengthy application form.

Tagada Platform

Open Finance — built into Tagada

See how Tagada handles open finance as part of its unified commerce infrastructure. One platform for payments, checkout, and growth.